The model item passed into the dictionary is of type 'WearablesWeb.Domain.Device', but this dictionary requires a model item of type 'WearablesWeb.Models.API_Models.SwiftypePostContainer'.

Server Error in '/' Application.

The model item passed into the dictionary is of type 'WearablesWeb.Domain.Device', but this dictionary requires a model item of type 'WearablesWeb.Models.API_Models.SwiftypePostContainer'.

Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.

Exception Details: System.InvalidOperationException: The model item passed into the dictionary is of type 'WearablesWeb.Domain.Device', but this dictionary requires a model item of type 'WearablesWeb.Models.API_Models.SwiftypePostContainer'.

Source Error:

The source code that generated this unhandled exception can only be shown when compiled in debug mode. To enable this, please follow one of the below steps, then request the URL:

1. Add a "Debug=true" directive at the top of the file that generated the error. Example:

  <%@ Page Language="C#" Debug="true" %>

or:

2) Add the following section to the configuration file of your application:

<configuration>
   <system.web>
       <compilation debug="true"/>
   </system.web>
</configuration>

Note that this second technique will cause all files within a given application to be compiled in debug mode. The first technique will cause only that particular file to be compiled in debug mode.

Important: Running applications in debug mode does incur a memory/performance overhead. You should make sure that an application has debugging disabled before deploying into production scenario.

Stack Trace:


[InvalidOperationException: The model item passed into the dictionary is of type 'WearablesWeb.Domain.Device', but this dictionary requires a model item of type 'WearablesWeb.Models.API_Models.SwiftypePostContainer'.]
   System.Web.Mvc.ViewDataDictionary`1.SetModel(Object value) +175
   System.Web.Mvc.ViewDataDictionary..ctor(ViewDataDictionary dictionary) +361
   System.Web.Mvc.WebViewPage`1.SetViewData(ViewDataDictionary viewData) +49
   System.Web.Mvc.RazorView.RenderView(ViewContext viewContext, TextWriter writer, Object instance) +99
   System.Web.Mvc.BuildManagerCompiledView.Render(ViewContext viewContext, TextWriter writer) +107
   System.Web.Mvc.HtmlHelper.RenderPartialInternal(String partialViewName, ViewDataDictionary viewData, Object model, TextWriter writer, ViewEngineCollection viewEngineCollection) +277
   System.Web.Mvc.Html.PartialExtensions.Partial(HtmlHelper htmlHelper, String partialViewName, Object model, ViewDataDictionary viewData) +91
   System.Web.Mvc.Html.PartialExtensions.Partial(HtmlHelper htmlHelper, String partialViewName, Object model) +33
   ASP._Page_Views_Devices_Details_cshtml.Execute() +14232
   System.Web.WebPages.WebPageBase.ExecutePageHierarchy() +197
   System.Web.Mvc.WebViewPage.ExecutePageHierarchy() +105
   System.Web.WebPages.StartPage.RunPage() +17
   System.Web.WebPages.StartPage.ExecutePageHierarchy() +64
   System.Web.WebPages.WebPageBase.ExecutePageHierarchy(WebPageContext pageContext, TextWriter writer, WebPageRenderingBase startPage) +78
   System.Web.Mvc.RazorView.RenderView(ViewContext viewContext, TextWriter writer, Object instance) +235
   System.Web.Mvc.BuildManagerCompiledView.Render(ViewContext viewContext, TextWriter writer) +107
   System.Web.Mvc.ViewResultBase.ExecuteResult(ControllerContext context) +291
   System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionResult(ControllerContext controllerContext, ActionResult actionResult) +13
   System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionResultFilterRecursive(IList`1 filters, Int32 filterIndex, ResultExecutingContext preContext, ControllerContext controllerContext, ActionResult actionResult) +56
   System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionResultFilterRecursive(IList`1 filters, Int32 filterIndex, ResultExecutingContext preContext, ControllerContext controllerContext, ActionResult actionResult) +420
   System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionResultWithFilters(ControllerContext controllerContext, IList`1 filters, ActionResult actionResult) +52
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.<>c__DisplayClass2b.<BeginInvokeAction>b__1c() +173
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.<>c__DisplayClass21.<BeginInvokeAction>b__1e(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +100
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResult`1.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +10
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResultBase`1.End() +49
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncControllerActionInvoker.EndInvokeAction(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +27
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.<BeginExecuteCore>b__1d(IAsyncResult asyncResult, ExecuteCoreState innerState) +13
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncVoid`1.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +29
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResultBase`1.End() +49
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.EndExecuteCore(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +36
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.<BeginExecute>b__15(IAsyncResult asyncResult, Controller controller) +12
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncVoid`1.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +22
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResultBase`1.End() +49
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.EndExecute(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +26
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.System.Web.Mvc.Async.IAsyncController.EndExecute(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +10
   System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.<BeginProcessRequest>b__5(IAsyncResult asyncResult, ProcessRequestState innerState) +21
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncVoid`1.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +29
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResultBase`1.End() +49
   System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.EndProcessRequest(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +28
   System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.System.Web.IHttpAsyncHandler.EndProcessRequest(IAsyncResult result) +9
   System.Web.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +9765901
   System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +155


Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET Version:4.7.2053.0

Flex Reviews

Tell us what you think!

You must be signed in to write a review. Sign in >

Tell us what you think!

On a scale of 5 being awesome, 1 being terrible, how would you rate this product?

* 15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
  • .
  • .
  • .
  15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
  • .
  • .
  • .
  15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
*
*
*indicates a required field
4 What the critics are saying:

This score shows the average across the reviews listed below

sort by
  • 0000201506034.75

    The Fitbit Flex has an excellent interface and app.

    If you're looking to start making healthier choices, the Fitbit Flex is a great motivator because of its easy-to-use nature, wide sync compatibility and fun color options.

    Published by TopTenReviews See the full review
  • 0000201506034.5

    Review: Fitbit Flex

    Great design. Best smartphone app of all the trackers on the market (Oh, and it’s on Android too). Amazing battery life. Scoble-proof: You can wear it in the shower.

    Published by Wired See the full review
  • 0000201506034.35

    Fitbit Flex review

    The Flex offers all the features you'd desire most in a fitness tracker while also being more attractive and more affordable than its competitors.

    Published by Engadget See the full review
  • 0000201506034.15

    Fitness monitor wristband that's cool and fun

    The Fitbit Flex is a cool fitness-tracking wristband that will keep you motivated for exercise and keep you moving.

    Published by PC Advisor See the full review
  • 0000201506034

    Editor Rating: Excellent.

    Among wrist-worn activity trackers, the Fitbit Flex is the best and most competitively priced one you'll find. If you're not stuck on wearing a bracelet, though, the Flex's close cousin, the Fitbit One, is the obvious choice.

    Published by PC Mag See the full review
  • 0000201506033.5

    Fitbit Flex review: A most versatile, feature-packed tracker

    A long list of features and a comfortable fit make Fitbit’s new Flex the best fitness tracker you can buy.

    Published by CNET See the full review
  • 0000201506033.5

    Fitbit Flex review

    Pros: Cheaper than some of the competition, Water resistant. Cons: No altimeter, Not much fun on its own, Not as accurate as other Fitbits.

    Published by Trusted Reviews See the full review
  • 0000201506033.5

    No such thing as wrist aversion

    For: Wraps around your wrist, Lightweight wristband is comfortable, Comes in multiple colours, Track activity and sleep

    Published by techradar See the full review
3.5 What the users are saying:

This score shows the average across the reviews listed below

  • 0001201506114

    I wear it everyday. Its the only wearable that I always pair with other products. So it is my constant companion.

    I think style wise I am fine with the product, I think logging is solid and I like that I can pair it with other fitbit data like my scale. In general I think as I view wearables I am interested in the long term data collection possible from platforms and brands that will last. I think fitbit is a winner and that is why I am a customer and a daily user.

    Published by jrkraft Jun 11, 2015See the full review
  • 0000201507274

    Great Activity Tracker But Limited Features

    This is a great activity tracker but the features are limited compared to other devices out there. That being said, if you're looking for something to accurate measure steps and sleep then this is a great product. If you want a little more other devices, such as a Pebble Smartwatch, can do the same for iPhone or Android. The pebble may not be quite as accurate for step counting but it comes very close. Overall, just look over your options, this device may be priced a bit high in today's activity tracker/smartwatch market.

    Published by Erick-Adame Jul 27, 2015See the full review
  • 0001201506123

    Simple mind hacker

    I enjoy the fitbit. The fairly cheap and simple device provides a simple yet effective mind hack mechanism; encouraging more less laziness throughout the day.

    Published by Matt-Hawkins Jun 12, 2015See the full review
  • 0000201506273

    Good intro device... for the day

    Good intro device for the day time to track steps. I hoped to make it part of my sleep routine, but said I slept 12 or 16 hours the first night (haven't slept that much since the 80s)

    Published by Daniel-Kryzanowski Jun 27, 2015See the full review
  • Pingback: Touch&Go Is About To Pay Off for Jawbone Up4 | This is The FitNest()

  • Pingback: What in the world is a wearable?? | PR Talk()

  • Rob Luton

    Nice design!

  • Pingback: Your watch just tells time??? | Josh's Words()

  • Rob

    I really like this one.

  • Rob Luton

    I cannot wait.

  • Orion

    Can’t wait. This is gonna be awesome.

  • Joe Contreras Jr

    The design of this watch is sleek and sexy. It looks fantastic with dressy attire! The cord that came with the watch was too short and the user interface of the watch was a pain to navigate. Dragging from the top of the watch took multiple attempts to properly function. Getting to main functions of the watch were not easily accessible (settings,etc)The screen itself is large enough to easily review what is on screen but not so big that it becomes a physical irritant or an eyesore. I despised having to download the Asus ZenWatch manager. That app had some highly annoying tendencies, such as a never-ending barrage of notifications from the app to connect to the Zenwatch. I would dismiss the alerts, but they would come right back and I could not figure out how to disable them. 2 out of 5 stars.

  • http://www.lidopacific.com jrkraft

    I put $700 Dollars in and now I am returning it and taking $700 out. Do I see a future yes. Blah Blah

  • Pingback: Innovative Idea – 9 | Pen and Paper()

  • Amy

    This is now $249

    .

  • Angus

    First off, I love the Pebble Time! I’m sold mainly because of its long lasting battery (7 days after a single charge), the minimalist UI and its sporty look. I can easily change the watch band with almost full customization. As for the downside, I don’t kinda like the dim screen of the PT as the screen could hardly seen indoors without the back light on. But this is the only complaint.

  • syliz hennington

    what if a woman wanted to wear this jacket? WHY! Is it specifically called a mens jacket. #RUDE #SEXISM IS ALIVE AND WELL!!!!!! Whips non-existant hair even though I’m a woman…and walks away…

  • Pingback: The LG Watch Urbane Luxe is the gold Apple Watch of Androids - Wearable Device()

  • Pingback: Review of Pebble Time: A simple smartwatch you’ll love to wear - Wearable Device()

  • Pingback: You can now pair an Android Wear smartwatch with an iPhone - Wearable Device()

  • Pingback: Sony’s crowdfunded Wena smartwatch could be a hit - if it ever gets here - Wearable Device()

  • Ed Ng

    IF you are looking for one of the top health fitness device out there currently, the FItbit HR is it. It is light and has great battery life. See review at http://webbizportal.com/fitbit-charge-hr-review/

  • Joseph Murdock

    Some of the features like Heart Rate monitoring or Step Tracking are not the best in terms of accuracy but at the same time, the Sleep tracking is just awesome. Some of the Fitbit’s fitness band review at https://fanreviews.co/fitness-trackers/fitbit-charge-hr does give much better comparison and in-depth coverage of all the fitness tracking activities.

    I think at the given cost, Fitbit Charge HR is still the best in the market with a house full of features. As you say it is a best all-around fitness band.

    It’s a pick for me.

  • Joan Pickering

    Simables.org is now open check out our posts