The model item passed into the dictionary is of type 'WearablesWeb.Domain.Device', but this dictionary requires a model item of type 'WearablesWeb.Models.API_Models.SwiftypePostContainer'.

Server Error in '/' Application.

The model item passed into the dictionary is of type 'WearablesWeb.Domain.Device', but this dictionary requires a model item of type 'WearablesWeb.Models.API_Models.SwiftypePostContainer'.

Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.

Exception Details: System.InvalidOperationException: The model item passed into the dictionary is of type 'WearablesWeb.Domain.Device', but this dictionary requires a model item of type 'WearablesWeb.Models.API_Models.SwiftypePostContainer'.

Source Error:

The source code that generated this unhandled exception can only be shown when compiled in debug mode. To enable this, please follow one of the below steps, then request the URL:

1. Add a "Debug=true" directive at the top of the file that generated the error. Example:

  <%@ Page Language="C#" Debug="true" %>

or:

2) Add the following section to the configuration file of your application:

<configuration>
   <system.web>
       <compilation debug="true"/>
   </system.web>
</configuration>

Note that this second technique will cause all files within a given application to be compiled in debug mode. The first technique will cause only that particular file to be compiled in debug mode.

Important: Running applications in debug mode does incur a memory/performance overhead. You should make sure that an application has debugging disabled before deploying into production scenario.

Stack Trace:


[InvalidOperationException: The model item passed into the dictionary is of type 'WearablesWeb.Domain.Device', but this dictionary requires a model item of type 'WearablesWeb.Models.API_Models.SwiftypePostContainer'.]
   System.Web.Mvc.ViewDataDictionary`1.SetModel(Object value) +175
   System.Web.Mvc.ViewDataDictionary..ctor(ViewDataDictionary dictionary) +361
   System.Web.Mvc.WebViewPage`1.SetViewData(ViewDataDictionary viewData) +49
   System.Web.Mvc.RazorView.RenderView(ViewContext viewContext, TextWriter writer, Object instance) +99
   System.Web.Mvc.BuildManagerCompiledView.Render(ViewContext viewContext, TextWriter writer) +107
   System.Web.Mvc.HtmlHelper.RenderPartialInternal(String partialViewName, ViewDataDictionary viewData, Object model, TextWriter writer, ViewEngineCollection viewEngineCollection) +277
   System.Web.Mvc.Html.PartialExtensions.Partial(HtmlHelper htmlHelper, String partialViewName, Object model, ViewDataDictionary viewData) +91
   System.Web.Mvc.Html.PartialExtensions.Partial(HtmlHelper htmlHelper, String partialViewName, Object model) +32
   ASP._Page_Views_Devices_Details_cshtml.Execute() +14335
   System.Web.WebPages.WebPageBase.ExecutePageHierarchy() +197
   System.Web.Mvc.WebViewPage.ExecutePageHierarchy() +105
   System.Web.WebPages.StartPage.RunPage() +17
   System.Web.WebPages.StartPage.ExecutePageHierarchy() +64
   System.Web.WebPages.WebPageBase.ExecutePageHierarchy(WebPageContext pageContext, TextWriter writer, WebPageRenderingBase startPage) +78
   System.Web.Mvc.RazorView.RenderView(ViewContext viewContext, TextWriter writer, Object instance) +235
   System.Web.Mvc.BuildManagerCompiledView.Render(ViewContext viewContext, TextWriter writer) +107
   System.Web.Mvc.ViewResultBase.ExecuteResult(ControllerContext context) +291
   System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionResult(ControllerContext controllerContext, ActionResult actionResult) +13
   System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionResultFilterRecursive(IList`1 filters, Int32 filterIndex, ResultExecutingContext preContext, ControllerContext controllerContext, ActionResult actionResult) +56
   System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionResultFilterRecursive(IList`1 filters, Int32 filterIndex, ResultExecutingContext preContext, ControllerContext controllerContext, ActionResult actionResult) +420
   System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionResultWithFilters(ControllerContext controllerContext, IList`1 filters, ActionResult actionResult) +52
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.<>c__DisplayClass2b.<BeginInvokeAction>b__1c() +173
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.<>c__DisplayClass21.<BeginInvokeAction>b__1e(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +100
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResult`1.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +10
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResultBase`1.End() +49
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncControllerActionInvoker.EndInvokeAction(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +27
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.<BeginExecuteCore>b__1d(IAsyncResult asyncResult, ExecuteCoreState innerState) +13
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncVoid`1.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +29
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResultBase`1.End() +49
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.EndExecuteCore(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +36
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.<BeginExecute>b__15(IAsyncResult asyncResult, Controller controller) +12
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncVoid`1.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +22
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResultBase`1.End() +49
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.EndExecute(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +26
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.System.Web.Mvc.Async.IAsyncController.EndExecute(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +10
   System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.<BeginProcessRequest>b__5(IAsyncResult asyncResult, ProcessRequestState innerState) +21
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncVoid`1.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +29
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResultBase`1.End() +49
   System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.EndProcessRequest(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +28
   System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.System.Web.IHttpAsyncHandler.EndProcessRequest(IAsyncResult result) +9
   System.Web.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +9765121
   System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +155


Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET Version:4.6.1590.0

Vivosmart Reviews

Tell us what you think!

You must be signed in to write a review. Sign in >

Tell us what you think!

On a scale of 5 being awesome, 1 being terrible, how would you rate this product?

* 15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
  • .
  • .
  • .
  15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
  • .
  • .
  • .
  15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
*
*
*indicates a required field
3.9 What the critics are saying:

This score shows the average across the reviews listed below

sort by
  • 0000201506104.5

    Garmin's Vivosmart might be all the smartwatch you need

    Garmin mixes activity tracking and smart notifications in a fitness band that bridges the gap between step counter and smartwatch

    Published by Digital Trends See the full review
  • 0000201506104

    Excellent

    Garmin's Vivosmart activity tracker counts steps, measures sleep, reminds you to move, and sends notifications, including text messages, to your wrist. Its midrange price point makes it an attractive option.

    Published by PC Mag See the full review
  • 0000201506104

    Garmin Vivosmart Review

    The Garmin Vivosmart wristband marries accurate activity tracking with smartphone notifications in a comfortable, minimalist design.

    Published by Tom's Guide See the full review
  • 0000201506103.6

    where fitness band meets smartwatch

    Garmin deserves praise for being one of the first companies to develop a fitness band that does double-duty as a smartwatch. That said, the device suffers from some uncomfortable ergonomics and an app that offers little in the way of motivation.

    Published by Engadget See the full review
  • 0000201506103.5

    An activity tracker with the heart of a smartwatch

    While it won't appeal to everyone, the Vivosmart is a solid activity tracker for those individuals who are also interested in receiving basic notifications on their wrist.

    Published by CNET See the full review
3 What the users are saying:

This score shows the average across the reviews listed below

  • 0000201606203

    Neat device in search of a better app

    I received the earlier version of the VivoSmart as a Christmas gift in 2015, and immediately found a place for it in my life. Like many other people though, I quickly noticed rapid decay in the OLED performance; to Garmin's credit when I called to find out how to fix it they offered to replace it free of charge. I asked for an upgrade to the Vivosmart HR and they provided it without complaint as a one-time courtesy. The new band is even better than the older one. One thing I liked about the original band was its "stealth" appearance. I'm not looking for a status symbol, I wanted something that was minimal in appearance and rich in function. It definitely provided that, as the OLED only displayed information when I tapped on it or received a notification from my phone. The new band isn't quite as understated, but it has a fairly streamlined display that is in keeping with the look I wanted. Since cell phones became widely available, I haven't worn a watch at all - quite happily. I found the constriction on my wrist, and the interference of the watch face with my hand when its extended annoying. The Vivosmart HR doesn't bother me at all; the face doesn't extend outside the width of the band, and the texture and fit of the band aren't noticeable to me. I was primarily interested in an activity tracking band to help me keep on top of taking exercise breaks at work. I don't have trouble with keeping weight off, but the studies showing the cardiovascular benefits of taking breaks from sedentary computer work are compelling. Overall step tracking, and the sleep monitoring were also attractive ideas to me. An unexpected benefit was the Garmin's ability to display notifications from my iPhone. I like not having to pull the phone out to check a new message or caller id. Particularly in meetings, its nice to be able to subtly check an incoming call or text to decide whether I need to deal with it. I don't need a fully interactive device like Apple's smart watch, which would only be an incrementally more useful device at a pretty steep increase in price. It is pretty nice having the notification connection though. I'm a motorcycle rider (no bluetooth in my helmet yet) and its great being able to glance at my wrist when my phone buzzes and see whether I need to pull off and respond to a call or text. The increase in functionality of the HR option is good - but not as useful as I was hoping. I do like being able to monitor my response to exercise conditioning by changes in average, basal heart rate - and I do feel the device displays an accurate measurement in most quiet activities like walking or light exercise - but it doesn't respond well to moderate or vigorous exercise. I'd like to think that my heart rate only goes up to 90 when running, but I know that's not the case. It does usually display a reasonable peak HR over time, but its instantaneous response is nowhere near accurate. The place where the device falls well short of expectations is the smartphone app. It syncs fine, and has useful summary displays, but the default assumptions of "running" or "cardio" have to be manually edited in the exercise log if you're doing something like rock climbing, or Crossfit, or soccer, and there is no way to display those activities on the watch face itself. A big bug that I haven't seen fixed is that the time stamp for an exercise session is always midnight for the following day, so if I train at 5pm on Thursday it gets logged as the middle of the night on Friday. Its not a deal breaker, but it is annoying. In any case, I'm very happy with the band itself and its doing exactly what I hoped it would. I have hope that Garmin will continue to improve the app and look forward to continued updates. A final note on battery life. More battery is always welcome, but I'd say this device's 5-6 days of life with my level of usage is fine, and frankly better than I was expecting. The only problem I have is that I only have one charging cord (its not a universal format) and that I'm always leaving it at home when I need it at work or vice-versa. The low battery warning comes on with adequate warning really, but recently its tended to be on Saturday morning when I left the cord on my computer at work.

    Published by John-Wallace Jun 20, 2016See the full review
  • Pingback: Touch&Go Is About To Pay Off for Jawbone Up4 | This is The FitNest()

  • Pingback: What in the world is a wearable?? | PR Talk()

  • Rob Luton

    Nice design!

  • Pingback: Your watch just tells time??? | Josh's Words()

  • Rob

    I really like this one.

  • Rob Luton

    I cannot wait.

  • Orion

    Can’t wait. This is gonna be awesome.

  • Joe Contreras Jr

    The design of this watch is sleek and sexy. It looks fantastic with dressy attire! The cord that came with the watch was too short and the user interface of the watch was a pain to navigate. Dragging from the top of the watch took multiple attempts to properly function. Getting to main functions of the watch were not easily accessible (settings,etc)The screen itself is large enough to easily review what is on screen but not so big that it becomes a physical irritant or an eyesore. I despised having to download the Asus ZenWatch manager. That app had some highly annoying tendencies, such as a never-ending barrage of notifications from the app to connect to the Zenwatch. I would dismiss the alerts, but they would come right back and I could not figure out how to disable them. 2 out of 5 stars.

  • http://www.lidopacific.com jrkraft

    I put $700 Dollars in and now I am returning it and taking $700 out. Do I see a future yes. Blah Blah

  • Pingback: Innovative Idea – 9 | Pen and Paper()

  • Amy

    This is now $249

    .

  • Angus

    First off, I love the Pebble Time! I’m sold mainly because of its long lasting battery (7 days after a single charge), the minimalist UI and its sporty look. I can easily change the watch band with almost full customization. As for the downside, I don’t kinda like the dim screen of the PT as the screen could hardly seen indoors without the back light on. But this is the only complaint.

  • syliz hennington

    what if a woman wanted to wear this jacket? WHY! Is it specifically called a mens jacket. #RUDE #SEXISM IS ALIVE AND WELL!!!!!! Whips non-existant hair even though I’m a woman…and walks away…

  • Pingback: The LG Watch Urbane Luxe is the gold Apple Watch of Androids - Wearable Device()

  • Pingback: Review of Pebble Time: A simple smartwatch you’ll love to wear - Wearable Device()

  • Pingback: You can now pair an Android Wear smartwatch with an iPhone - Wearable Device()

  • Pingback: Sony’s crowdfunded Wena smartwatch could be a hit - if it ever gets here - Wearable Device()

  • Ed Ng

    IF you are looking for one of the top health fitness device out there currently, the FItbit HR is it. It is light and has great battery life. See review at http://webbizportal.com/fitbit-charge-hr-review/

  • Joseph Murdock

    Some of the features like Heart Rate monitoring or Step Tracking are not the best in terms of accuracy but at the same time, the Sleep tracking is just awesome. Some of the Fitbit’s fitness band review at https://fanreviews.co/fitness-trackers/fitbit-charge-hr does give much better comparison and in-depth coverage of all the fitness tracking activities.

    I think at the given cost, Fitbit Charge HR is still the best in the market with a house full of features. As you say it is a best all-around fitness band.

    It’s a pick for me.

  • Joan Pickering

    Simables.org is now open check out our posts