The model item passed into the dictionary is of type 'WearablesWeb.Domain.Device', but this dictionary requires a model item of type 'WearablesWeb.Models.API_Models.SwiftypePostContainer'.

Server Error in '/' Application.

The model item passed into the dictionary is of type 'WearablesWeb.Domain.Device', but this dictionary requires a model item of type 'WearablesWeb.Models.API_Models.SwiftypePostContainer'.

Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.

Exception Details: System.InvalidOperationException: The model item passed into the dictionary is of type 'WearablesWeb.Domain.Device', but this dictionary requires a model item of type 'WearablesWeb.Models.API_Models.SwiftypePostContainer'.

Source Error:

The source code that generated this unhandled exception can only be shown when compiled in debug mode. To enable this, please follow one of the below steps, then request the URL:

1. Add a "Debug=true" directive at the top of the file that generated the error. Example:

  <%@ Page Language="C#" Debug="true" %>

or:

2) Add the following section to the configuration file of your application:

<configuration>
   <system.web>
       <compilation debug="true"/>
   </system.web>
</configuration>

Note that this second technique will cause all files within a given application to be compiled in debug mode. The first technique will cause only that particular file to be compiled in debug mode.

Important: Running applications in debug mode does incur a memory/performance overhead. You should make sure that an application has debugging disabled before deploying into production scenario.

Stack Trace:


[InvalidOperationException: The model item passed into the dictionary is of type 'WearablesWeb.Domain.Device', but this dictionary requires a model item of type 'WearablesWeb.Models.API_Models.SwiftypePostContainer'.]
   System.Web.Mvc.ViewDataDictionary`1.SetModel(Object value) +175
   System.Web.Mvc.ViewDataDictionary..ctor(ViewDataDictionary dictionary) +361
   System.Web.Mvc.WebViewPage`1.SetViewData(ViewDataDictionary viewData) +49
   System.Web.Mvc.RazorView.RenderView(ViewContext viewContext, TextWriter writer, Object instance) +99
   System.Web.Mvc.BuildManagerCompiledView.Render(ViewContext viewContext, TextWriter writer) +107
   System.Web.Mvc.HtmlHelper.RenderPartialInternal(String partialViewName, ViewDataDictionary viewData, Object model, TextWriter writer, ViewEngineCollection viewEngineCollection) +277
   System.Web.Mvc.Html.PartialExtensions.Partial(HtmlHelper htmlHelper, String partialViewName, Object model, ViewDataDictionary viewData) +91
   System.Web.Mvc.Html.PartialExtensions.Partial(HtmlHelper htmlHelper, String partialViewName, Object model) +33
   ASP._Page_Views_Devices_Details_cshtml.Execute() +14231
   System.Web.WebPages.WebPageBase.ExecutePageHierarchy() +197
   System.Web.Mvc.WebViewPage.ExecutePageHierarchy() +105
   System.Web.WebPages.StartPage.RunPage() +17
   System.Web.WebPages.StartPage.ExecutePageHierarchy() +64
   System.Web.WebPages.WebPageBase.ExecutePageHierarchy(WebPageContext pageContext, TextWriter writer, WebPageRenderingBase startPage) +78
   System.Web.Mvc.RazorView.RenderView(ViewContext viewContext, TextWriter writer, Object instance) +235
   System.Web.Mvc.BuildManagerCompiledView.Render(ViewContext viewContext, TextWriter writer) +107
   System.Web.Mvc.ViewResultBase.ExecuteResult(ControllerContext context) +291
   System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionResult(ControllerContext controllerContext, ActionResult actionResult) +13
   System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionResultFilterRecursive(IList`1 filters, Int32 filterIndex, ResultExecutingContext preContext, ControllerContext controllerContext, ActionResult actionResult) +56
   System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionResultFilterRecursive(IList`1 filters, Int32 filterIndex, ResultExecutingContext preContext, ControllerContext controllerContext, ActionResult actionResult) +420
   System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionResultWithFilters(ControllerContext controllerContext, IList`1 filters, ActionResult actionResult) +52
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.<>c__DisplayClass2b.<BeginInvokeAction>b__1c() +173
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.<>c__DisplayClass21.<BeginInvokeAction>b__1e(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +100
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResult`1.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +10
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResultBase`1.End() +49
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncControllerActionInvoker.EndInvokeAction(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +27
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.<BeginExecuteCore>b__1d(IAsyncResult asyncResult, ExecuteCoreState innerState) +13
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncVoid`1.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +29
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResultBase`1.End() +49
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.EndExecuteCore(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +36
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.<BeginExecute>b__15(IAsyncResult asyncResult, Controller controller) +12
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncVoid`1.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +22
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResultBase`1.End() +49
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.EndExecute(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +26
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.System.Web.Mvc.Async.IAsyncController.EndExecute(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +10
   System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.<BeginProcessRequest>b__5(IAsyncResult asyncResult, ProcessRequestState innerState) +21
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncVoid`1.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +29
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResultBase`1.End() +49
   System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.EndProcessRequest(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +28
   System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.System.Web.IHttpAsyncHandler.EndProcessRequest(IAsyncResult result) +9
   System.Web.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +9765121
   System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +155


Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET Version:4.6.1590.0

Pebble Time Reviews

Tell us what you think!

You must be signed in to write a review. Sign in >

Tell us what you think!

On a scale of 5 being awesome, 1 being terrible, how would you rate this product?

* 15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
  • .
  • .
  • .
  15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
  • .
  • .
  • .
  15
  • .
  • .
  • .
*15
*
*
*indicates a required field
3.7 What the critics are saying:

This score shows the average across the reviews listed below

sort by
  • 0000201506104

    Pebble Time Reviewed

    Pebble Time is the follow-up to one the best smartwatches. It's not as fancy as the all-metal Pebble Steel, but it's a marked improvement over the original Pebble inside and out.

    Published by TechRadar See the full review
  • 0000201506103.5

    The utility vehicle of smartwatches is back with a few new tricks

    The Pebble Time adds a few key improvements and a color screen compared to previous Pebble watches, but owners of previous Pebble watches may not see a need to upgrade yet.

    Published by CNET See the full review
  • 0000201506103.5

    The Pebble Time Review

    If you compare the Pebble Time to the original Pebble, it's like night and day. It's better looking, it now has a colour screen and the new smart strap feature has the potential to make this the most versatile smartwatch around.

    Published by Trusted Reviews See the full review
4 What the users are saying:

This score shows the average across the reviews listed below

  • 0000201507044

    A all around watch!

    This watch has proven to me many times how useful it is I had the first pebble and I loved it and now I have the pebble time I will say the batter life is not 7 but a stedy 5 days I am not sure if that is because I have a no stop moving watch face it could be but I still love it! If your looking for a watch that is cool high tech and reliable this is the watch for you!

    Published by hunter-wright Jul 04, 2015See the full review
  • 0000201508034

    First off, I love the Pebble Time! I'm sold mainly because of its long lasting battery (7 days after a single charge), the minimalist UI and its sporty look. I can easily change the watch band with full customization. Also I use the watch mainly for tracking my steps, runs, workouts and sleep. You will be satisfied if you are willing to pay extra money for the paid apps, e.g. Plexfit, Sleep for Android etc, but so far they work wonders! As for the downside, I don't kinda like the dim screen of the PT as the screen could hardly seen indoors without the back light on. But this is the only complaint.

    Published by Angus-Chan Aug 03, 2015See the full review
  • 0000201508174

    A Very Simple Smartwatch That You’ll Love to Wear

    The Pebble Time still leads in the smartwatch market. The design is a huge improvement from the original Pebble and now makes wearing a Pebble on your wrist look stylish. The watch doesn’t have the best screen or any time of cutting edge technology, but it’s still a very good watch. And it’s just that, a watch. It tells the time ALL the time. That may seem like a silly thing to say but it’s a huge advantage to be able to look at your wrist in any situation and easily tell what time it is. Of course, the Pebble Time also makes notifications fun with the new color animations on the color e-paper display. And the Timeline is a neat new feature with the potential to grow into something more. Overall, the design, the up to 7 days of battery life and the user experience make the Pebble Time a watch that I love and I brag about it to all my family and friends. The Good: *Battery Life is great (at least 3-4 days) *Very lightweight and Comfortable to Wear *Fun User Interface with cute animations *Developers are constantly making this watch better The Bad: *The screen can seem very dim at times *The bezel becomes scratched very easily *The gap between glass and color screen creates weird shadows on the screen *Limited compatibility with iPhone

    Published by Erick-Adame Aug 17, 2015See the full review
  • 0001201508204

    A good basic smart watch

    The Pebble Time is a good smartwatch but has some limitations on iOS. You can get your notifications but are unable to act on them. I find that I miss fewer calls and messages with the notifications on my wrist. Also the battery life is nice. I have to charge it about once every 4 days. I backed the Kickstarter campaign but at $199.99 it seems a little too expensive for only minor improvements from the original Pebble.

    Published by Alex-Marsh Aug 20, 2015See the full review
  • Pingback: Touch&Go Is About To Pay Off for Jawbone Up4 | This is The FitNest()

  • Pingback: What in the world is a wearable?? | PR Talk()

  • Rob Luton

    Nice design!

  • Pingback: Your watch just tells time??? | Josh's Words()

  • Rob

    I really like this one.

  • Rob Luton

    I cannot wait.

  • Orion

    Can’t wait. This is gonna be awesome.

  • Joe Contreras Jr

    The design of this watch is sleek and sexy. It looks fantastic with dressy attire! The cord that came with the watch was too short and the user interface of the watch was a pain to navigate. Dragging from the top of the watch took multiple attempts to properly function. Getting to main functions of the watch were not easily accessible (settings,etc)The screen itself is large enough to easily review what is on screen but not so big that it becomes a physical irritant or an eyesore. I despised having to download the Asus ZenWatch manager. That app had some highly annoying tendencies, such as a never-ending barrage of notifications from the app to connect to the Zenwatch. I would dismiss the alerts, but they would come right back and I could not figure out how to disable them. 2 out of 5 stars.

  • http://www.lidopacific.com jrkraft

    I put $700 Dollars in and now I am returning it and taking $700 out. Do I see a future yes. Blah Blah

  • Pingback: Innovative Idea – 9 | Pen and Paper()

  • Amy

    This is now $249

    .

  • Angus

    First off, I love the Pebble Time! I’m sold mainly because of its long lasting battery (7 days after a single charge), the minimalist UI and its sporty look. I can easily change the watch band with almost full customization. As for the downside, I don’t kinda like the dim screen of the PT as the screen could hardly seen indoors without the back light on. But this is the only complaint.

  • syliz hennington

    what if a woman wanted to wear this jacket? WHY! Is it specifically called a mens jacket. #RUDE #SEXISM IS ALIVE AND WELL!!!!!! Whips non-existant hair even though I’m a woman…and walks away…

  • Pingback: The LG Watch Urbane Luxe is the gold Apple Watch of Androids - Wearable Device()

  • Pingback: Review of Pebble Time: A simple smartwatch you’ll love to wear - Wearable Device()

  • Pingback: You can now pair an Android Wear smartwatch with an iPhone - Wearable Device()

  • Pingback: Sony’s crowdfunded Wena smartwatch could be a hit - if it ever gets here - Wearable Device()

  • Ed Ng

    IF you are looking for one of the top health fitness device out there currently, the FItbit HR is it. It is light and has great battery life. See review at http://webbizportal.com/fitbit-charge-hr-review/

  • Joseph Murdock

    Some of the features like Heart Rate monitoring or Step Tracking are not the best in terms of accuracy but at the same time, the Sleep tracking is just awesome. Some of the Fitbit’s fitness band review at https://fanreviews.co/fitness-trackers/fitbit-charge-hr does give much better comparison and in-depth coverage of all the fitness tracking activities.

    I think at the given cost, Fitbit Charge HR is still the best in the market with a house full of features. As you say it is a best all-around fitness band.

    It’s a pick for me.

  • Joan Pickering

    Simables.org is now open check out our posts